Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Zoning Unlocked Phase 2→At a glance
- Public comments
- 12
- Last 30 days
- 1
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 26, 2026.
Public comments (13)
Longtime Upper Duke of Gloucester resident urged the council to preserve the historic district's residential core, sequence housing and short-term rental decisions before zoning changes, and not shortchange enforcement resources.
City Council (Special) - Oct 26, 2026 · 1:19:22 →Ward 1 Residents Association president pushed back on the 'residents always say no' narrative and asked why the city keeps calling major zoning changes minor despite 120 residents showing up in August.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 53:31 →The Planning Commission chair welcomed code simplification and supported the C-1A/C-1 merger and more housing types, citing the commission's report.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 57:03 →Read the Ward 1 Residents Association's formal position opposing the rezoning proposals and calling for more study, especially on C-1A protections and Duke of Gloucester/Conduit Street changes.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:00:27 →Historic Annapolis president urged protecting the city's heritage character, opposed removing the Duke of Gloucester transition zone, and asked for a pause until STR rules are done.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:03:50 →Said historic Annapolis streets can't handle more traffic — she's been hit by cars twice at a stop sign — and questioned sewage capacity.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:08:39 →Lifelong resident warned that adding density downtown is a 'ticking time bomb' for public safety given only three roads out of the city.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:10:57 →A new downtown resident who loves the city and asked that changes not be rushed, wanting to stay a good neighbor to current residents.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:10:34 →Argued zoning, STR rules, ADU law, and O-11-26 must be evaluated together for cumulative impact, and that no data justifies removing C-1A protections.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:15:20 →Called the proposals ill-advised, said carving homes into four units makes no sense with inadequate parking, and predicted investor purchases will change neighborhood character.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:18:40 →Called public engagement 'performative' and handed the mayor a city walking-tour document she said reveals a density agenda targeting single-family homes on Franklin Street.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:18:29 →An attorney who argued the proposal violates the 2040 long-range plan and Maryland land-use law because it doesn't serve affordable/workforce housing goals in the historic district.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:26:40 →Questioned the staff's parking-impact data and said removing C-1A protections without STR caps first makes homes prime investor targets.
City Council (Regular) - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:30:46 →